Why Unit Price Is the Wrong KPI for Industrial Purchasing Decisions
Why Unit Price Is the Wrong KPI for Industrial Purchasing Decisions
It’s easy to understand why unit price becomes the headline KPI in procurement. It’s measurable, comparable and visible on every quote and invoice.
But in industrial environments, unit price alone rarely reflects the true cost of a purchasing decision. The real cost often appears later — when a job stops, a line goes down, a maintenance window slips, or a critical item simply isn’t available when needed.
The truth is simple: in industry, availability and reliability often matter more than saving a few pence per item.
What Unit Price Fails to Capture
A lower unit price can look like a saving, but it often ignores performance, reliability and continuity of supply. In practice, hidden cost typically shows up as:
- Unplanned downtime and lost production
- Delays caused by stock-outs, substitutions or last-minute sourcing
- Rework caused by inconsistent performance or specification variation
- Emergency purchases, courier costs and reactive buying
- Higher replacement frequency and increased maintenance effort
A component that’s 10% cheaper but fails twice as often isn’t a saving — it becomes a risk to productivity, scheduling, safety and compliance. And even when quality is acceptable, poor availability can have the same effect: the job stops until the right item is in hand.
Total Cost of Ownership Is the KPI That Matters
A smarter way to evaluate industrial purchasing is to think in terms of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) — what you pay upfront plus what it costs to keep operations running reliably.
In practical terms, TCO is influenced by:
- Service life and replacement frequency
- Consistency of performance (the same result, every time)
- Impact on downtime and maintenance scheduling
- Availability and continuity of supply (preventing stock-outs)
- Safety and compliance suitability (particularly for PPE and safety items)
When you measure cost this way, it becomes clear why downtime and stock availability are where the real money is won or lost. The cheapest option is rarely the one that delivers the lowest total cost over time.
Why Stock Availability Creates Hidden Cost
Availability is often overlooked until it becomes a problem. If the right consumable, spare or site-critical item isn’t available when needed, the cost is immediate: lost time, disrupted schedules and the need to buy alternatives at short notice.
Strong continuity of supply reduces last-minute substitutions and reactive purchasing — helping you keep maintenance plans on track and minimise disruption to production.
That’s why the best buying decisions often prioritise dependable supply and consistent specification over the lowest unit price on a single quote.
Partner with Jones and Clark (BOT) LtdMake purchasing decisions that reduce total cost — not just unit price. |
